Assessment

A post-16 perspective on the EBacc

Eddie Playfair, Association of Colleges, provides a personal view of the education system, informed by decades of teaching and advising post-16 students.

Date10/05/22

AuthorEddie Playfair, Senior Policy Manager, Association of Colleges

The conversation about the EBacc should be about more than just subjects and standards at Key Stage 4. It needs to be about the whole curriculum and the very purpose of education.

This means discussing how students learn and develop, how we describe achievement, how we label students’ ‘potential’ and ‘ability’ and what we mean by success. It means thinking about how we describe a curriculum and how we decide on the value and status of particular knowledge and skill.

It means considering the social context of students’ learning in terms of class, culture, privilege and ‘disadvantage’ and also the way learners are selected and sorted. We need to discuss how we organise education, how we decide which opportunities to offer which students, as well as the policy aims around levelling up, social mobility and social justice.

The aim of the EBacc is to provide wider opportunities for further study post-16. It aims to include subjects which open doors to ‘high status’ degrees and ‘high tariff’ universities: English language and literature, maths, science (double or triple), a language, and geography or history. The target was for 75% of pupils to study the full EBacc by 2022, and 90% by 2025 although this seems unlikely to be achieved.

One of the positives is that we are having a conversation about an entitlement curriculum. Another is the fact the EBacc is not intended to define the whole 14-16 curriculum and leaves schools free to innovate and offer more subjects, including vocational qualifications. As the 2010 Schools White paper stated: “The EBacc should not limit schools’ ambitions for their pupils.”

But there are also concerns. The EBacc effectively creates a hierarchy of subjects which devalues those not included. There are no arts or creative subjects, no practical or vocational options, no sociology, no citizenship, politics or economics. Where are the foundations which could help students understand what is going on in the world around them and our current global predicament?

History and Geography, for instance, are both essential ways of understanding the world, but ‘History or Geography’ potentially rules out the study of either one or the other from 14. Why would we want any 14-year-old to drop either of these subjects?

The EBacc is a list of subjects rather than a programme of study, and this particular selection is not justified by intrinsic educational merit, usefulness or cultural importance to students. It is not designed to engage, motivate or excite students by connecting the content to their lives and aspirations. Also, unless it’s for everyone, it will be seen as an ‘academic’ stream, narrowing rather than opening up opportunities.

A curriculum is not just a checklist of content to cover. It should build foundations and create a series of opportunities to engage with different fields of study throughout life.

So I think we need to ask:

What approach would help build the foundation for a lifetime of successful learning?
How do we make the curriculum motivating, stretching, engaging, broad and diverse?
What knowledge and skills, or essential literacies, do we want all young people to access if they are to be introduced to human society and culture?

Perhaps we could think in terms of 4 C’s: coherence, choice, continuity and change. Coherence implies a holistic study programme that hangs together and makes sense to students with an emphasis on the purpose and usefulness of each element. Continuity requires some common threads connecting Key Stage 4 with post-16 study, supporting progression and providing the rungs of the ladder. Change and transition at 16 can itself be motivating with students able to exercise more choice, demonstrate more maturity and enjoy more autonomy in a new setting where more specialist options are available.

I see no reason why coherence, breadth, choice and specialisation can’t be made available to all. They should certainly not be limited to those students who have already achieved the most success. The idea that a broader curriculum is more ‘difficult’ or less accessible risks short-changing those students deemed to be ‘less able’ and undermining attempts to narrow gaps or level-up.

One example of a holistic approach to curriculum planning being piloted in England is the pre-T Level transition programme which offers a framework for post-16 programmes at level 2. It includes diagnostic monitoring, guidance and pastoral support, personal development and enrichment, positive attitudes and behaviours, English, maths and digital skills, work experience and a category of ‘other knowledge and skills, including skills for successful study and work.’

This framework approach could provide the core for a broader 14-19 curriculum for all students. It would need to be part of a lifelong approach which connects the different phases and reflects a broader, less age-specific approach from KS4 towards Further and Higher Education and work. It could increase opportunities for success and progression, stretch and specialization, skills development, research, practical application and action.

We could identify some essential foundational ‘literacies’ to provide a basis for students to build on: literacy itself, numeracy, scientific and technological, cultural and historical, creative and aesthetic, political and economic, personal, social and emotional.

So, my take-home message is that we need a broader and more engaging National Bacc which prepares for and connects with post-16 study programmes for all students, and that we need to be having this conversation.

As part of AQi’s work, we are inviting people from a wide range of viewpoints to engage with us on a wide range of topics. We welcome alternative views to help stimulate discussion and ideas. The views of external contributors do not necessarily represent the views of AQi or AQA.

Computing

Could girls be the secret to boosting the UK’s growth as a technology superpower?

What if women played a more central role in responding to the rapid technological changes in our world? Girls in England outperform boys at every grade level but disproportionately don’t take Computer Science at GCSE.

Assessment

What can this year’s GCSE entries tell us to look for in tomorrow’s results?

With GCSE Results published on 22nd August, Dr Chinwe Njoku looks into the underlying data on what subjects this year's cohort took and how this has changed from previous years.

Assessment

A-level maths students hit six figures – what’s behind its popularity?

On Thursday, more than 100,000 A-level maths students in England will find out their results – 11.4% more than last year. Why the upturn? Dr Chinwe Njoku, AQA Education Insights Lead and former maths teacher, was heartened by the news and keen to look at the story behind the data.

Education Policy

What comes after ‘urgent’ for the new Education Secretary?

After the burning issues are addressed, what should come next for the new Education Secretary?

Education Policy

Labour’s oracy plans: They need clear goals

Sir Keir Starmer has said he wants to boost students’ confidence by raising the importance of speaking skills – oracy. In this previously published blog, Reza Schwitzer, AQA’s director of external affairs, applauds the ambition but warns there needs to be clear goals

Education Policy

Through the looking glass: How polling the public can help policymakers learn about themselves

Public attitude data is key to effective policymaking. Proper polling can reveal what people think about existing policies and what they want for the future. But, if looked at from a different angle, it can also help policymakers question themselves and their assumptions about the public. In this blog, AQA’s Policy and Evidence Manager Adam Steedman-Thake, reveals the lessons he learned about himself while reading a recent public attitude survey.

Assessment

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Oracy skills are vital to success in school and life. And yet, for many children, opportunities to develop them are missed. Educationalists are engaging in a growing debate about where oracy fits into the school system. Labour has put it at the heart of its plans to improve social mobility and an independent commission is looking at how it is taught in the classroom. This renewed focus on oracy means it is more important than ever that teachers have a way to reliably assess and understand their students’ attainment and progression. Amanda Moorghen of oracy education charity Voice 21 explains how Comparative Judgement can help with that and why it may be a game changer.

Education

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

Jack Black is probably best known in educational circles for playing a renegade substitute teacher in School of Rock. But the Hollywood star has made a more conventional foray into education by backing the use of TV subtitles to improve child literacy. Stephen Fry and the World Literacy Foundation also want parents to use their TV remotes to get children reading. So, could this simple click of a button be a solution to boost pupils’ reading skills? AQA’s resident expert on language teaching, Dr Katy Finch, casts her eye over the research to see whether it stacks up.

Data Analysis

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Is data the solution to all education’s issues? About a decade ago the prevailing wisdom said it was. Advocates of this Data Wave argued that harvesting internal statistics would help schools solve issues such as teacher accountability and attainment gaps. As with all waves, after crashing onto the beach they recede, leaving space for another to roll in. In this blog, teacher, author and data analyst Richard Selfridge looks at the legacy of the Data Wave to see what schools can take from it.

International Approaches

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

Finland was once recognised as one of the most successful educational systems in the world. At the turn of the millennium, it topped the PISA rankings in reading, maths and science. But by 2012, decline set in. The last set of results showed performances in maths, reading and science were at an all-time low. In this blog Dr Jonathan Doherty of Leeds Trinity University outlines some reasons that may account for the slide.

Download a PDF version.

Download a copy of this content to your device as a PDF file. We generate PDF versions for the convenience of offline reading, but we recommend sharing this link if you'd like to send it to someone else.

A post-16 perspective on the EBacc

Could girls be the secret to boosting the UK’s growth as a technology superpower?

What can this year’s GCSE entries tell us to look for in tomorrow’s results?

A-level maths students hit six figures – what’s behind its popularity?

What comes after ‘urgent’ for the new Education Secretary?

Labour’s oracy plans: They need clear goals

Through the looking glass: How polling the public can help policymakers learn about themselves

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

Join the conversation on Twitter

Download a PDF version.

Sign up to our newsletter